NAACP Rests Case Against Firearms
Industry
"Full of sound and fury, signifying
nothing."
BROOKLYN, NY - Having utterly failed to prove the baseless
allegation that the firearm industry knowingly and willingly
sells guns to criminals, the NAACP has rested its case after
four weeks of testimony.
"The NAACP has not proven its baseless and highly offensive
allegation against a law abiding industry. The case was, as
Shakespeare wrote in Macbeth, 'full of sound and fury, signifying
nothing'," said Lawrence G. Keane, vice president and
general counsel of the National Shooting Sports Foundation
(NSSF). The NSSF is the firearm industry's trade association.
Despite the stunningly poor case the NAACP offered, Keane
remained pessimistic about the trial's outcome. "We are
not under any delusions. Due to Ms. Barnes and the NAACP's
blatant judge shopping, the verdict is almost certainly preordained.
The NAACP is offering the same evidence from the same expert
witnesses in front of the same judge as the 1999 Hamilton
trial. The NAACP case is Judge Weinstein's mulligan,"
Keane said. Weinstein's Hamilton decision was reversed on
appeal.
"Judge Weinstein, not the "advisory" jury
will decide this case," Keane added.
NAACP general counsel Dennis Hayes opened the case by comparing
the defendants to segregationists and baby killers. His comments
were so outrageous that Judge Weinstein admonished Mr. Hayes
and had to remind the "advisory" jury that the case
was not about segregation or discrimination. Hayes openly
admitted the NAACP was pursuing its lawsuit because legislators
had not enacted its anti-gun agenda.
The NAACP's witnesses included NAACP employee Mildred Roxborough,
NAACP president Kweisi Mfume, and the self-described "bombshell
witness," Robert Ricker. Additionally, in an attempt
to substitute "junk" science for actual evidence,
the NAACP called several "experts" whose opinions
have already been rejected by New York courts.
Ms. Roxborough testified the NAACP has absolutely no knowledge
of any wrongdoing by any defendant that caused any harm to
the NAACP or enabled a criminal to obtain a firearm, or was
a factor in any firearm related injury or death.
Former Congressman and current NAACP President Kweisi Mfume's
testimony was insightful as to his and the NAACP's shocking
lack of knowledge about the firearm industry and how it's
regulated. Despite his years in Congress, Mfume testified
he didn't know how the industry was regulated, but he thinks
the industry is responsible for crime because the government,
in his opinion, isn't doing enough to enforce the laws that
regulate the sale and distribution of firearms. Those laws,
of course, are passed by Congress. Although he couldn't say
what the industry has failed to do, he was sure it wasn't
enough to keep guns out of the hands of criminals.
Mfume also testified the NAACP didn't sue a single retailer
because he thought retailers are regulated, implying manufacturers
and distributors are not. "Testimony from a former congressman
that retailers are regulated while manufacturers and distributors
are not is inexcusable and proves just how little Mfume, the
NAACP and its attorneys know about the industry they are blaming
for the acts of criminals," Keane said.
Next, the NAACP called "bombshell" witness Robert
Ricker, who briefly headed a now defunct firearm industry
trade group in 1999. When confronted with his former statements
denouncing lawsuits, like the NAACP's, that avoid the legislature
in order to regulate through litigation, he simply said he
made those statements for the gun trade group he worked for
at the time. He then admitted that he's now being paid $225
an hour by the NAACP to testify on its behalf.
There were, however, some statements about his former industry
from which Ricker did not distance himself. He told the "advisory"
jury that the vast and overwhelming majority of firearm manufacturers
and distributors are good, honest businessmen.
The NAACP's attorney, Ms. Barnes, also called many of the
same "experts" she used in her ultimately failed
1999 Hamilton suit against the firearm industry, also heard
by Judge Weinstein. "This agenda driven, 'junk' science
has already been rejected by New York's high court,"
Keane said. "Bogus statistics are not a substitute for
evidence, something the NAACP doesn't have," he added.
The defense will now call acknowledged experts to refute
the plaintiff's scientifically and methodologically flawed,
intellectually dishonest, agenda-driven conclusions. "We
welcome the opportunity to show the advisory jurors, and hopefully
Judge Weinstein, how baseless, frivolous and hollow the NAACP's
case is," Keane said.
"This case is the poster child for the need in Congress
to pass the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (S 659).
This common sense legal reform will end junk lawsuits like
the NAACP's that seek to blame law abiding manufacturers for
the actions of criminals. The legislation has already passed
the House by an overwhelming, bi-partisan majority of votes
and is supported by a majority of the Senate. Thirty states
have already adopted similar legislation," Keane said.
- 30 - |