Firearms Industry Prepares
For Ambush In Brooklyn Court
Selection of “Advisory Jury”
Begins Today
NEWTOWN, CT – The trial of the NAACP’s lawsuit
that seeks to blame gun makers for gun violence in African-American
communities began today in Brooklyn federal court before Judge
Jack B. Weinstein, considered in legal circles to be the nation’s
most liberal, activist judge.
The trial began with the selection of an “advisory”
jury to hear, but not decide, the case. Judge Weinstein had
earlier denied the gun makers’ demand that a jury decide
the case. Instead Judge Weinstein will decide the trial’s
outcome and is free to disregard the advisory jury’s
findings.
“The NAACP’s outrageous and defamatory allegation
that gun makers knowingly and willingly sell guns to criminals
is identical to the claims being made by big city mayors,
greedy trial lawyers and radical anti-gun groups in a series
of municipal lawsuits filed against members of the firearms
industry in cities like Chicago, Newark, Washington, DC and
New York City,” said Lawrence G. Keane, vice president
& general counsel of the National Shooting Sports Foundation,
the firearm industry’s trade association.
“Blaming manufacturers for crime is an utterly discredited
legal theory and is simply wrong. That’s why these cases
have been overwhelmingly dismissed by the courts. Where cases
have been allowed to proceed, these despicable allegations
have been proven to be false. That’s why Boston abandoned
its case and California’s case was just thrown out of
court after three years of discovery,” added Keane.
Elisa Barnes, attorney for the NAACP, successfully manipulated
this lawsuit into the court of Judge Weinstein. She pulled
the same fast move several years earlier to get a similar
case, Hamilton v. Accu-Tek, into Judge Weinstein’s court
room, which resulted in a 1999 jury verdict against gun makers
that was later thrown out by an appellate court.
In order to ensure Judge Weinstein would hear the NAACP case,
Barnes didn’t sue Beretta USA Corp., the third largest
handgun manufacturer in the United States. Barnes had earlier
sued Beretta USA in the Hamilton case. Had she sued Beretta
USA, court rules would have prevented the case from being
heard in federal court because
both Beretta USA and the NAACP are based in Maryland, thereby
preventing Barnes from steering the case into Judge Weinstein’s
courtroom.
“The NAACP obviously thought it more important to have
a judge it thinks will be favorably predisposed to its case
than to sue one of the largest gun makers in the country.
The funny thing is Ms. Barnes thought Beretta USA was very
important in the Hamilton case. I highly doubt her opinion
of Beretta USA, wrong as it may be, has recently changed,”
said Keane.
The NAACP’s lawsuit is being funded by, and receiving
legal assistance from, extreme anti-gun groups like the Brady
Center to Prevent Handguns, the Violence Policy Center, Americans
for Gun Safety, the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence, the Irene
Diamond Fund, George Soros’ Open Society Institute and
Funders’ Collaborative For Gun Violence Prevention.
“These anti-gun groups have joined forces in this lawsuit
to try and achieve their unpopular anti-gun agenda through
this lawsuit. They are before an activist judge they believe
will, regardless of the facts presented, rule in their favor,”
Keane said. “These groups know the clock is running
out on their abuse of our judicial system. They know a majority
of both the Senate and the House of Representatives are sponsoring
the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (S. 659/H.R.
1036) that will stop these junk lawsuits that try to blame
manufacturers for crime,” Keane added.
According to a recent poll conducted by the American Tort
Reform Association 83.4% of Americans believe there are too
many lawsuits in America. In another recent poll conducted
by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, 69% of Americans said they
would be more favorable toward their Senator or Representative
if they voted to reform the way class action lawsuits are
handled in the United States.
“The time has come for Congress to enact common sense
legal reforms to restore integrity and fairness to our judicial
system and put a stop to these junk lawsuits that waste millions
of taxpayer dollars and threaten to bankrupt an entire industry
and eliminate thousands of important manufacturing jobs,”
said Keane.
The National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF), formed in
1961, is the trade association for the firearms and recreational
shooting sports industry.
-30-
|